Share

APEC Form No. 7 Adjudicator Performance Evaluation Card - Rating System (Personal Staff)

DAR APEC evaluation form to evaluate performance of provincial adjudicator to be filled up by the Personnel Staff

Your Browser Doesn't Support Canvas. Showing the Text Content of the PDF Instead: APEC Form No. 7 (to be filled up by the Personnel Staff)

Department of Agrarian Reform Adjudication Board
Adjudicator Performance Evaluation Card - Rating System
Criteria and Weighted Points to Evaluate Performance of Provincial Adjudicator
SEMESTER:
NAME:
POSITION:
Provincial Adjudicator
PLACE OF ASSIGNMENT:

YEAR:

CRITERIA

RATING

BEHAVIORAL (15%) (V and VI)
V.

Cooperation, Professionalism and Initiative (10%)
Attendance at meetings initiated by the Board/Secretariat/RARAD
1.
Compliance with DAR/DARAB Memos and SOs
2.
Attendance at DAR seminars/workshops
3.
Adoption of effective system for caseload reduction
4.
5.
Advisories/observations/reports re DARAB PINCs
6.
Requests for clarification on DARAB issues
Solutions proposed on DARAB PINCs
7.

VI.

Integrity (5%)
No. of pending administrative cases (with formal charge )*
1.
2.
No. of adverse audit results/findings of IAS, COA or DARAB Secretariat
SCALE:
Grading Rate

Equivalent Adjectival Rating

100%
95% - 99%
90% - 94%
85% - 89%
80% -84%
75% - 79%
70% - 74%

Exceptional
Commendable
Good Solid Performance
Above Average
Average
Below Average
Unacceptable

* Per definition of the revised URAC, for a pending administrative case to exist, there must be a
Formal Charge issued to the respondent.
Evaluator
Name (L,F,MI):
Position:
Employee Number:
 
Page of
Share